| |
|||||
|
| Humerus,
Diaphysis, wedge fracture, bending wedge |
0,21% of the total 2,96% of the humerus 13,40% of the segment |
|||||||
![]() 7 fractures 6% group 43% 43%M, 57% F |
![]() |
![]() 76 fractures 65,5% group 69%M, 31%F |
![]() |
![]() 33 fractures 28,5% group 63%M, 37%F |
![]() |
||||||||||
| Proximal section | Middle section | Distal section | |||||||||||||
| These are diaphyseal fractures of the humerus with a bending wedge third fragment, usually a short wedge and associated to a small fragment. Once reduced, there is contact between the proximal and distal fragments. | Ref.
Manual of Internal Fixation: 232 - 251. 442 - 445. Surgeon. LO. |
|||||
|
These
fractures are quite unstable because of their short fracture lines in
a small segment. Conservative treatment or Hackethal´s intramedullary
nailing may be tried but the results are uncertain. In young patients,
manual workers and sportsmen, we believe that it is more effective to
secure the internal fixation with a straight plate, following the principles
stated for the types A and B, with some added technical considerations. |
The ideal implant is the titanium LC-DCP plate, of a size proportionate to that of the bone, placed in the aspect of the diaphysis that will be less likely to interfere with the blood supply of the wedge, that is to say, on the side opposite to the largest cortical surface of the wedge. We use few LC-DCP plates in fractures of other locations of the skeleton because of their cost. However, for the fractures of the humeral diaphysis we think that it is cost effective because of the advantage of being almost sure that the plate will not have to be removed. The removal of a plate in the territory of the radial nerve always carries great risk. |
|||||
|
|