| |
|||||
|
| Humerus,
Diaphysis, wedge fracture, spiral wedge |
0,22% of the total 3,11% of the humerus 14,08% of the segment |
|||||||
![]() 21 fractures 17,2% group 38%M, 62%F |
![]() |
![]() 41 fractures 33,6% group 51%M, 49%F |
![]() |
![]() 60 fractures 49,2% group 52%M, 48%F |
![]() |
||||||||||
| Proximal section | Middle section | Distal section | |||||||||||||
| These are fractures with a spiral wedge third fragment, located at the proximal or at the middle third of the humeral diaphysis. Once reduced, there is contact between the proximal and distal fragments. | Ref.
Manual of Internal Fixation: 232 - 251. 442 - 445. Surgeon. RO, JM, LO. |
|||||
|
The
proximal fractures may extend up to the level of the humeral neck, requiring
some method of internal fixation that holds on to the humeral head. The
classic implant is the T-plate but, whenever possible, we prefer to use
a plate cut and contoured to form a hook (see A2.1) so as not to interfere
with the path-way of the bicipital tendon. |
with
a plate that will guarantee a fast healing and an early functional recovery.
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
| These are fractures with a spiral wedge third fragment, located at the distal third of the humeral diaphysis. Once reduced, there is contact between the proximal and distal fragments. | Ref.
Manual of Internal Fixation: 232 - 251. 442 - 445. Surgeon. RO, RO. |
|||||
|
Since they have a broad fracture surface, healing time will be short. However, their location at the segment .3 (distal) means that they will usually require anatomic reduction and stable internal fixation. It is essential to follow the principles of interfragmentary compression with lag screws (preferably through the plate) and to neutralize the fracture site with a plate of a size proportionate to that of the bone. The plate must be contoured for proper adaptation to the distal flare of the diaphysis, as explained for the A1.3 subgroup. In this segment, the cortices are quite hard and the screws will have an excellent hold. |
In
the case illustrated in the superior half of the page, the interfragmentary
compression was performed with lag screws through the plate. In the other
case, interfragmentary compres-sion was performed with independent screws
(4.5 mm) while the fracture site was neutralized with a one-third tubular
plate with 3.5 mm screws (sufficient because of the size of the bone). |
|||||
|
|